Saturday, 24 November 2018 / Published in Articles

We are delighted to announce that we have appointed Aaron Mullen to our Litigation Department and Eleanor McFeeters to our Property Department. This is part of the firm’s continued expansion so that we can continue provide the highest standard of service to our ever increasing clientele. 2018 has been a hugely successful year for the firm, rounded off by being awarded the Junior Chamber International Best Professional Services Business.

Aaron Mullen joins the firm having qualified as a solicitor in England & Wales in September 2018. Aaron is a graduate of Queen’s University, Manchester Metropolitan University and completed his 2 year training contract with a law firm in Manchester. Aaron will join our litigation department advising both claimants and defendants on road traffic accidents, accidents at work, criminal injuries and various areas of employment law.

Eleanor McFeeters joins the firm’s property department and is a qualified Fellow of the Institute of Legal Executives (FCILEx). Eleanor is a graduate of John Moore’s University and has over 12 years’ experience in the
Property industry. Eleanor has spent most of her career with a law firm in Liverpool prior to relocating back to Northern Ireland. Eleanor ‘s expertise include residential sales & purchases, leasehold transactions, mixed residential and commercial properties, right to buy, help to buy, Islamic mortgages, re-mortgages, repossessions purchases, transfer of equity, new builds and Help to Buy Schemes. Eleanor has a proven track record of acting for buyers, sellers and on behalf of developer.

Both Eleanor and Aaron are available to consult with clients at our Derry~Londonderry office and our Strabane office, please call 02871 371705 .



Sunday, 09 September 2018 / Published in Articles, Law


McCay Solicitors are delighted with the finding of the Vice-President of the Industrial Tribunal in the case of Anthony Millar v Foyle Food Group Limited in which we acted on behalf of the Claimant (full decision available here

The Claimant had been one of two managers in the Respondent’s boning hall but had been absent from work for a number of months due to health issues. During his absence the Respondent promoted an employee to a newly created 5th supervisor position and a couple of weeks later advised the Claimant that he was “at risk” of redundancy. The Claimant was scored lower than the other manager on his length of service and was dismissed by the Respondent. The Claimant brought proceedings before the Industrial Tribunal alleging that he had been unfairly dismissed on the grounds that;

(i) Redundancy was not the genuine reason for dismissal – the genuine reason was the Claimant’s sick leave;
(ii) That the redundancy process was a sham, was erroneous and the pool for selection should have included the supervisors and bumping was not considered;
(iii) The Claimant should have been notified that changes were being implemented in the management structure and informed of the vacancy of 5th Supervisor;

The Respondent’s General Manager, Ambrose McAleer, gave evidence that the decision to create a 5th Supervisor role was taken “in advance of any decision by the Respondent to review the number of Managers within the Boning Hall.” Mr McAleer stated that the decision to remove one of the Boning Hall Managers was not decided until a Senior Management Board Meeting on 02/02/17 and the HR team was first informed on 06/02/17. Mr McAleer’s evidence was contradicted by his colleagues Kara Marshall (HR Manager) and Nigel McIlwaine (Group Finance & HR Director) who both gave evidence that they had been advised that the decision had been taken in 2016.

The Respondent’s timeline was compromised in the Claimant’s referral to Occupational Health by Ms Marshall on 26/01/2017 in which she asked “Does Anthony have the ability/mental capability to participate in a re-structuring process for the management of the boning hall?” and “what effects could a restructuring have on Anthony’s health?” At the consultation on 30 January 2017, the doctor asked the Claimant how he would feel about a possible restructure within the Respondent and how he felt he would cope with a possible redundancy situation.

After being signed off as fit for work by his GP, the Claimant then attempted to return to work however Mr Leslie Otterson attempted to prevent him from returning emailing the Occupational Health doctor “are you happy for us to prevent him from returning to work on Monday based on your assessment?” Mr McAleer and Ms Marshall held consultation meetings with the Claimant and dismissed him from his employment. The Claimant submitted a detailed appeal which was rejected Mr McIlwaine.

The Tribunal upheld the Claimant’s claim and awarded him £8,392 in compensation. In his judgement, the Tribunal Vice President, Judge Noel Kelly, rejected the Respondent’s case and commented that that the evidence given by Kara Marshall and Nigel McIlwaine was “not credible” and “unlikely” and more generally that “much of the Respondent’s evidence in the matter was simply not credible.”

Following the case, our Managing Director Gareth McCay, said “This was a case where the Claimant was seriously mistreated by his employer at a time when he was unwell and it is clear that there was a conspiracy to remove him from his role. We were delighted to get a positive result for Mr Millar who has been vindicated in pursuing this matter.”

The Claimant was represented by Mr Oisin Friel BL instructed by Gareth McCay, McCay Solicitors.
The Respondent was represented by Barry Mulqueen BL instructed by Liam Magill, O’Hare Solicitors.

Wednesday, 25 October 2017 / Published in Business, Uncategorized
Employment Dicipline

Ok, so we did the Conducting a Disciplinary Procedure – Back to Basics article back in November with the trickier aspects to follow but we have been exceptionally busy over the past few months so we are only getting an opportunity to add the second instalment now. We have looked at 6 areas namely confidentiality, surveillance, witness anonymity, failure to attend, stress-related illness and criminal investigations.


Monday, 14 December 2015 / Published in Business
Festive hangover

The Christmas period is now in full swing and for many employers it will involve organising time off for staff and of course the obligatory Christmas party. Competing annual leave requests and alcohol-fuelled incidents at the Christmas party can create issues for employers so we have decided to produce some guidance in relation to both issues.



Here's A Quick Way To Resolve Staffing Issues!

Protect your business in less than 5 minutes
Download Now
You can unsubscribe at anytime.
Click Me